Jan. 16, 2024
On Sept. 1, 2023, California enacted a new law (SB 699, to be codified at Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code sec. 16600.5) reiterating its non-compete ban contained in Section 16600 that is effective Jan. 1, 2024.
New Section 16600.5 provides that any contract that is void under Section 16600 is also unenforceable, regardless of when and where the contract was signed, and an employer or former employer cannot enforce or attempt to enforce a contract that is void regardless of whether the contract was signed and the employment was maintained outside of California. In addition, Section 16600.5 provides that (1) an employer cannot enter into a contract with an employee that is void under Section 16600, (2) any employer doing so commits a civil violation (i.e., it is unlawful per se to commence an action to enforce an illegal non-compete agreement), and (3) an employee or prospective employee may bring an action to enforce this law for injunctive relief or the recovery of actual damages, or both, with attorney’s fees to prevailing employees, former employees, or prospective employees.
On Oct. 13, 2023, California also enacted a new law (AB 1076, to be codified at Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code sec. 16600.1) effective Jan. 1, 2024 that requires employers of California employees, by Feb. 14, 2024, to provide all (1) current employees and (2) former employees employed after Jan. 1, 2022, who were parties to unlawful non-compete clauses or agreements with written notice that such clauses or agreements are void. Notice must be in the form of a written individualized communication to the employee or former employee, delivered to their last known address and email address. A violation of this notice provision is an act of unfair competition pursuant to California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code sec. 17200, which provides for a civil penalty.
As a background, California law voids contracts that restrain an employee from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind. Specifically, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code sec. 16600 states, “[E]very contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void.” The three statutory exceptions to the prohibition against such contracts are:
Courts have also carved out certain limited exceptions, such as non-competes that apply during employment.
Several open questions remain regarding these new laws, including whether they apply to non-solicitation agreements. SB 699 refers to agreements “void under this chapter,” which may encompass prior case law holding that customer non-solicitation clauses are generally void. Further, while AB 1076 specifically refers to “noncompete” agreements (not agreements “void under this chapter”), the statute says that “[t]his section shall be read broadly.”
In light of these new laws, employers should consider conducting a privileged audit of employment agreements with existing and former employees employed after Jan. 1, 2022, in California to determine the scope and legality of existing restrictive covenants. Such audit should consider the existence of remote work arrangements – whether intentional or unintended. If AB 1076 notice is required, employers may need to be prepared to ensure that it is individualized, in writing, and sent to the last known address and email address of each affected employee by Feb. 14, 2024.
For more information, please contact attorneys in the Employment and Labor Group at Nelson Mullins.
These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.