June 16, 2020
Today, the General Assembly reconvened for its 31st Legislative Day (the second legislative day of the COVID era), and the environment remains both strange and amusing. While the people watching is supreme (and included one legislator out of the Wild West clad in cowboy hat, bandana mask, and boots today), process remains arduous with House roll call votes requiring upwards of 15 minutes each.
The sluggishness cannot be attributed to process alone, however. The House and Senate remain at loggerheads over hate crimes legislation. Although HB 426, authored by Representative Chuck Efstration (R-Dacula), awaits action in the Senate Judiciary Committee, onlookers spent much of the day waiting on an alternative draft of the bill that Lieutenant Governor Geoff Duncan has billed as “strong” and “meaningful.” But as Tuesday concludes, it appears that the unveiling of the draft must wait one day more. Meanwhile, House Speaker David Ralston (R-Blue Ridge) called for passage of HB 426 as drafted, and a coalition of Georgia’s business leaders continue to push for a bill to address bigotry and targeted violence. As a point of punctuation, House Rules Chairman Richard Smith (R-Columbus) refused to put any Senate bills on today’s Rules Calendar for the House, stating that the Senate’s failure to take up the bill “is becoming an embarrassment to the state.”
Otherwise, it was a normal day at your State Capitol. The chambers convened, committees met, and Augusta University was present onsite and performing testing for COVID-19. Members of the General Assembly and members of the public were encouraged to be tested.
As a reminder, the Senate Appropriations Committee meets early Wednesday morning to unveil its version of the State’s funding plan that will take effect on July 1. Follow the highlights as they unveiled on Twitter with #GoldDomeReport.
In this Report:
Notable Floor Action
House
The House had a relatively light day today, moving forward with a consent calendar of local measures which was handily adopted. Speaker David Ralston (R-Blue Ridge) asked that HB 1161 be moved back to its committee; this bill relates to the City of Blue Ridge and staggered terms for its mayor and city council members.
The House took up SB 43, which was held until the next legislative day from Monday. SB 43 addresses Title 36 and adds a new definition for ‘undertaking” as it relates to revenue bonds for electric systems - for those entities with more than $300 million in assets will no longer be required to have a bond referendum. Representative Kasey Carpenter (R-Dalton) presented the legislation. It only impacts Dalton and will allow the city to issue revenue bonds to expand electric services. Representative Karla Drenner (D-Avondale Estates) spoke to the proposal - she opposed the legislation. The real issue she has is the bill is a moral hazard - one party has an incentive to take risks without responsibility. If the bill passes, it removes the right to vote of the citizens in the area. Representative Carpenter described that the bill offers parity - but Representative Drenner questioned what parity is missing? Originally, the law required a public referendum. A Minority Report was also offered by Representative Derrick Jackson (D-Tyrone) and Representative Beth Moore (D-Peachtree Corners) - Representative Moore indicated she was surprised to see that this bill made the priority list of bills given the situation of the state. The House rejected this initiative three times previously with local legislation. The bill was changed to a “general bill” as it did not work as a local bill. Thus, the House was now asked to take action on this issue around whether the city needed to approve a bond referendum. Representative Moore asked that the House vote no on the bill and protect individuals’ right to vote. Chairman Don Parsons (R-Marietta) yielded his time to the sponsor, Representative Carpenter. No city council spoke in opposition to the legislation according to Chairman Parsons. Representative Mary Margaret Oliver (D-Atlanta) asked if Georgia Power supports the legislation. The legislation passed 91-75.
Representative Trey Kelley (R-Cedartown) moved that SB 410 be moved from the House Governmental Affairs Committee to the House Ways and Means Committee. The legislation proposes to provide an alternative means of recovering costs of litigation and attorney’s fees in ad valorem tax appeals under county boards of equalization. His motion was approved.
Representative Andy Welch (R-McDonough) moved that the House agree to the Senate Substitute to HR 1023, the waiver of sovereign immunity Constitutional Amendment effort. The House approved the Senate changes by a vote of 164-0.
Senate
The Senate took up two measures today:
Committee Reports
House Rules Committee
Chairman Richard Smith (R-Columbus) and the members of the House Rules Committee met quickly this morning. No House Rules Calendar was set for the day. Chairman Smith reminded his Committee that he thought the General Assembly was required to pass two bills - legally they were required to pass a budget and morally they were required to pass a hate crimes bill. Georgia is one of four states without a hate crimes statute. The current hate crimes bill, HB 426, passed the House in 2019 and has been in the Senate for more than 400 days without any action taken.
House Health and Human Services Committee
Chairman Sharon Cooper (R-Marietta) and her Committee took up several bills:
House Retirement Committee
Chairman Tommy Benton (R-Jefferson) and his Committee met to discuss two bills:
Senate Regulated Industries and Public Utilities
Chairman Bill Cowsert (R-Athens) and his Committee took up these proposals:
Joe Hood, with the Department of Community Health, outlined the changes made. Mr. Hood indicated that this bill addresses personal care homes with beds of 25 or greater, assisted living communities (already more than 25 persons and more), and nursing homes. There are exceptions in the personal care homes; they don’t have the same infrastructure standards and fire safety standards like assisted living facilities and nursing homes. No standard on “memory care” but that can be found in personal care homes, assisted living facilities and nursing homes. This bill addresses a standard of care for memory care, higher than the administrative rule in place now. More of the specifics include: Section 1 (no discrimination or retaliation for reporting abuse); Section 2 (creates a certificate program within two licensure types for memory care- base of a personal care home or assisted living facility and apply if the entity meets the added requirements for memory care); Section 3 (increases fines in two ways - daily from $1000 up to $2000 per day (max) and caps individual violation of $40,000 and provides a mandatory provision of $5000 causes a death or serious injury due to violation of rule of law); Section 5 (direct care staff training and onsite staffing 1:15 day; 1:20 at night (minimum floor staffing but requires the facility to conduct an assessment and the facility is obligated to have appropriate staffing - 1:12 for memory in day and 1:15 for memory at night) and requires facilities to show financial stability and notice of 60 days if a bankruptcy risk so folks may be moved); Section 6 (mandatory minimum for the assessments to determine level of care needed - increases staffing component); Section 8 (authorizes DCH to create this memory care certificate); bill addresses protocols for pandemic diseases and communication plan as well as education training protocols and surge capacity among many other protections; adds testing of long term care facilities is addressed for residents and staff; and Section 9 (amends licensure of nursing home administrators act and adds assisted living administrators and personal care home administrators with 25 or more beds and changes the board to include representatives from these facilities on that board). Trying to balance care with affordability pursuant to Chairman Cowsert; these added facilities are private pay (except for some nursing homes). Some of the larger nursing homes will receive added funding from the federal government due to COVID-19 expenses. The legislation requires these facilities to have seven days of PPE and that date requirement is from the federal Operation Commitment to Care effort.
Senator Matt Brass (R-Newnan) indicated he likes the certificate for memory care but inquired whether there was an added cost for that certificate. Mr. Hood indicated that there will be a cost through licensure application for the certificate.
Tony Marshall, with the Georgia Health Care Association, spoke to the measure. Marshall had concerns about some of the added provisions, particularly around combatting COVID-19 (adequate PPE, testing and reporting). Mr. Marshall is concerned about the costs for testing requirements for residents and staff; he agreed it was necessary for the asymptomatic carriers and the GHCA is working with the national folks on this testing requirement and costs. The Georgia Alzheimer’s Association supported the proposal.
Senator Steve Gooch (R-Dahlonega) inquired about the costs for the Department to administer this; there is no budget request in the Budget for these changes.
Senator Brass moved DO PASS Substitute to HB 987 and that motion was seconded by Senator Butch Miller (R-Gainesville). The motion carried unanimously with the DO PASS recommendation. Senator Brian Strickland (R-McDonough) will carry the bill further in the Senate.
Environmental Quality Subcommittee of the House Natural Resources Committee
The Environmental Quality Subcommittee of the House Natural Resources, chaired by Representative John Corbett (R-Lake Park), met today to consider four measures.
Resource Management Subcommittee of the House Natural Resources Committee
The Resource Management Subcommittee of the House Natural Resources Committee, chaired by Representative Timothy Barr (R-Lawrenceville) met today to consider multiple measures.
Rules Calendars for Legislative Day 32
The House Rules Committee did not set an agenda for Legislative Day 32 and is not currently scheduled to meet before the House gavels in.
The Senate, however, is expected to consider the following measures on Wednesday for Legislative Day 32:
These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.