Mary has litigated complex discovery and e-discovery issues in class actions and in multidistrict litigations and mass torts, defending pharmaceutical, medical device, and automotive manufacturers. She has handled briefing and oral arguments on high-stakes discovery motions in multiple states and federal courts. She has extensive experience negotiating and litigating complex discovery issues, focusing on the...
Mary has litigated complex discovery and e-discovery issues in class actions and in multidistrict litigations and mass torts, defending pharmaceutical, medical device, and automotive manufacturers. She has handled briefing and oral arguments on high-stakes discovery motions in multiple states and federal courts. She has extensive experience negotiating and litigating complex discovery issues, focusing on the needs of the case in order to manage and reduce the burdens of overly broad and disproportionate discovery.
She has appeared pro hac vice in multiple venues defending clients on scope issues, electronically stored information orders (ESI) and compliance, preservation, and review of ESI, database and unstructured data, back-up data, ESI collection methods, litigation holds, confidentiality of electronic documents, TAR, and computer-assisted review.
She is a frequent lecturer and author and has testified to the Federal Advisory Committee on Civil Rules in 2019 in support of proposed amendments to Rule 30(b)(6) on corporate depositions and to the Minnesota Senate Judiciary Committee in Support of Repeal of Minnesota Seat Belt Gag Rule in February 2019.
needs of the case in order to manage and reduce the burdens of overly broad and disproportionate discovery.
She has appeared pro hac vice in multiple venues defending clients on scope issues, electronically stored information orders (ESI) and compliance, preservation, and review of ESI, database and unstructured data, back-up data, ESI collection methods, litigation holds, confidentiality of electronic documents, TAR, and computer-assisted review.
She is a frequent lecturer and author and has testified to the Federal Advisory Committee on Civil Rules in 2019 in support of proposed amendments to Rule 30(b)(6) on corporate depositions and to the Minnesota Senate Judiciary Committee in Support of Repeal of Minnesota Seat Belt Gag Rule in February 2019.
Mary has litigated complex discovery and e-discovery issues in class actions and in multidistrict litigations and mass torts, defending pharmaceutical, medical device, and automotive manufacturers. She has handled briefing and oral arguments on high-stakes discovery motions in multiple states and federal courts. She has extensive experience negotiating and litigating complex discovery issues, focusing on the... needs of the case in order to manage and reduce the burdens of overly broad and disproportionate discovery.
She has appeared pro hac vice in multiple venues defending clients on scope issues, electronically stored information orders (ESI) and compliance, preservation, and review of ESI, database and unstructured data, back-up data, ESI collection methods, litigation holds, confidentiality of electronic documents, TAR, and computer-assisted review.
She is a frequent lecturer and author and has testified to the Federal Advisory Committee on Civil Rules in 2019 in support of proposed amendments to Rule 30(b)(6) on corporate depositions and to the Minnesota Senate Judiciary Committee in Support of Repeal of Minnesota Seat Belt Gag Rule in February 2019.