Nov. 22, 2021
Employers throughout the United States have no doubt been following the developments related to the various federal vaccine mandates and state responses to the same. Since President Biden signed the three Executive Orders on the OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard for Employers with 100 or more employees, the Federal Contractor Mandate, and the CMS Mandate for healthcare providers who accept Medicare and Medicaid funds (collectively, the “Federal Vaccine Mandates”), Nelson Mullins attorneys have been assisting and advising clients in various industries and sectors on issues related to compliance and implementation.
Last week, the State of Florida passed legislation opposing the Federal Vaccine Mandates[1] and filed a lawsuit specifically challenging the CMS Mandate for healthcare providers who accept Medicare and Medicaid funds.[2] Below, we explore issues relevant to Florida Healthcare Providers in evaluating their obligations under the federal CMS Rule and under Florida’s new legislation.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), a division of the Department of Health and Human Services, published its Omnibus COVID-19 Health Care Staff Vaccination requirements that most Medicare- and Medicaid-certified providers and suppliers must meet to participate the Medicare and Medicaid programs (the “CMS Rule”). This emergency regulation is effective as of November 5, 2021 and will cover approximately 17 million workers at about 76,000 healthcare facilities across the country.
On Monday, November 15, 2021, the Florida Legislature convened a Special Legislative Session focusing on vaccine mandates. On Thursday, November 18, 2021, the legislature passed legislation prohibiting private employers in Florida from imposing COVID-19 vaccination mandates for any employee without providing certain individual exemptions that allow an employee to opt out of vaccination requirements. This legislation went into effect immediately.
There is widespread litigation throughout the country challenging the federal vaccine mandates. Adding to that list, on Wednesday, November 17, 2021, the State of Florida filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida challenging the CMS Rule[5] and seeking a temporary restraining order, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, and declaratory relief (Case No. 3:21-cv-02722-MCR-HTC). The Florida lawsuit challenges the CMS Rule on the following bases: (a) CMS lacks the power and authority to issue an industry-wide vaccination mandate; (b) CMS failed to fulfill its statutory duty to consult with appropriate state agencies in developing the mandate in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1395; (c) CMS did not engage in the notice and comment process set out in the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), and lacked good cause to do so; (d) CMS acted arbitrarily and capriciously in issuing the mandate; and (e) the CMS Rule violates the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution. See Complaint at ¶¶ 9-13. These arguments are similar to arguments lodged in pending lawsuits across the country. The State of Florida simultaneously filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which was denied by the District Court on Saturday, November 20, 2021.
Nelson Mullins is continuing to monitor the Florida lawsuit and will provide updates regarding any court orders that are issued which affect the enforcement of the CMS Rule.
This situation is rapidly evolving, and healthcare providers in Florida face challenges because Florida’s legislation conflicts with the CMS Rule. The CMS Rule only provides exemptions from the vaccination requirement for employees with medical conditions under the ADA or sincerely held religious beliefs under Title VII. However, Florida’s legislation allows far broader exemptions arguably at odds with the CMS Rule, as well as an employee’s agreement to submit to periodic testing and an employee’s agreement to use PPE in the workplace, an option specifically addressed and rejected by the CMS Rule.
Although there are many unknowns at this time, the CMS Rule provides some guidance. In anticipation of state legal challenges or legislative prohibitions on vaccine mandates, CMS expects a Covered Facility to follow the requirements of the CMS Rule. The CMS Rule specifically states that it pre-empts any state law to the contrary, pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. See U.S. Const. art. VI § 2.
The recent denial of Florida’s request for preliminary injunction on the CMS Rule provides some indication that Florida Providers can and should follow the CMS Rule – for now. However, if Florida Providers were to implement the CMS Rule, that provider could be subject to state fines mentioned above. However, there are greater risks associated with failing to comply with the CMS Rule, including termination from the Medicare and Medicaid program. Therefore, Florida Healthcare Providers need to comply with all CMS Rules so that they can ensure no interruption of payments, penalties, or termination from the CMS programs.
Nelson Mullins is continuing to monitor this situation and evaluate options moving forward. Please contact a Nelson Mullins attorney to discuss your questions related to the Federal Vaccine Mandates.
[1] H.B. 1-B, 2d Spec. Sess. (Fla. 2021).
[2] State of Florida v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al., CASE NO. 3:21cv2722-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla.).
[3] The CDC addressed pregnancy -related concerns surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines in Guidance: COVID-19 Vaccines While Pregnant or Breastfeeding, available at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.html (last visited Nov. 22, 2021). The Florida Department of Health, however, expanded exemptions based on pregnancy and “anticipated pregnancy” in its recently published exemption forms which extend well beyond the federal guidance on both medical and religious exemptions. See Florida Department of Health COVID-19 Vaccination Exemption Forms | Florida Department of Health (floridahealth.gov).
[4] Accordingly, Florida’s legislation provides broader exemptions than the CMS Rule. In addition, although less relevant to Florida healthcare providers, the legislation states:
[5] The defendants named in the suit are the Department of Health and Human Services; Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services; the United States of America; Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid; and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid.
These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.