June 13, 2023
Check out the latest episodes on the Stark Integrity podcast hosted by Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP's Nashville partner Bob Wade, featuring professionals in the healthcare industry.
Big changes are coming. In this episode, Wade continues his discussion of split/shared billing for Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) with Jodi Nayoski and Andrea Ferrari of Pinnacle Healthcare Consulting. Hear how the crediting of wRVUs will be affected, the impact the change will have on measures of productivity, why you should consider changes to provider compensation plans, what it means for compensation for NPPs, and how Fair Market Value (FMV) plays into things.
It’s going to get confusing. In this episode, Wade talks split/shared billing for Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) with Jodi Nayoski and Andrea Ferrari of Pinnacle Healthcare Consulting. Hear when the new guidelines go into effect, why the documentation must be substantive, how to correctly identify the date of service, the difference between APPs and NPPs, and what this all means for split/shared visits.
Is the knowledge requirement under the False Claims Act (FCA) objective or subjective? In this episode, Wade dives into the murky waters. Hear why the fines and penalties if the FCA applies are huge, murky regulations could be a defense under the FCA, why you should continue to operate as if the subjective factors would apply, the highlights from recent FCA cases, and the origin of the FCA.
Incorporating Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) has many benefits and risks. In this episode, Wade lays out those compliance risks and safeguards. Hear the 4 components of the quadruple aim, why you need documentation for incident-to and split/shared visits, how to handle credit given to any physician for the wRVUs performed by the APP, who’s considered an APP, and the discussion point in which Wade might be stepping into quicksand.
These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.