June 27, 2025
On June 27, 2025, the United States Supreme Court ruled in FCC v. Consumers’ Research that the Universal Service Fund’s funding mechanism is constitutional.
The Court’s 6-3 majority opinion, authored by Justice Kagan and joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson, reversed the decision of the Fifth Circuit and held that the Universal Service Fund’s funding mechanism is constitutional, rejecting challenges that it involved unconstitutional public and private delegations (to the Federal Communications Commission and to Universal Service Administrative Company, respectively).
Concurring opinions were issued by Justices Kavanaugh and Jackson. Justice Kavanaugh wrote to highlight his concerns over congressional delegations to independent agencies. Justice Brown wrote to highlight her skepticism with respect to judicially imposed limitations on private delegation.
A dissenting opinion written by Justice Gorsuch and joined by Justices Thomas and Alito argued that “universal service” taxes are an unconstitutional delegation of Congress’s taxation authority. Citing Loper Bright, the dissenting opinion expresses hope that the majority’s opinion will not stand the test of time.
Join us for an insightful, first-look examination of the SCOTUS USF decision, including a breakdown of the majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions, expected near-term and long-term practical impacts of the decision, and what’s next for the USF in the courts, at the FCC, and in Congress.
These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.