April 25, 2025
This article continues a series offering practical guidance to developers, owners, and project teams on how to proactively harmonize American Institute of Architects (AIA) construction documents with the broader contractual framework governing a project. The previous installment explored how to align AIA terms with construction loan agreements. This edition shifts focus to commercial lease provisions — especially in ground-leased retail, mixed-use, or anchor-tenant developments — that often dictate delivery milestones, risk allocation, and default remedies.
For many developers and owners, the problem starts with timing: lease negotiations conclude well in advance of development commencing, and include detailed construction timelines, force majeure notice periods, and delivery conditions. But, by the time construction counsel is brought in to negotiate the AIA contract with the general contractor, contractual requirements have already been determined. The result? A contractor could perform exactly as promised under the AIA agreement and still leave the owner in default under the lease.
We recommend reviewing and aligning the following five provisions between the commercial lease and the AIA A101-2017 Standard Form of Agreement and A201-2017 general conditions to avoid the disconnect between lease and AIA terms. These aren’t just legal issues — they’re business-critical alignment points that can make or break project delivery and financial performance.
AIA Contract Term (A201-2017, §15.1.3.1): Allows the contractor to provide written notice of a delay claim within 21 days of the event giving rise to the delay. Separately, force majeure events are addressed under A201 §8.3.1, which permits an extension of time for causes beyond the contractor’s control, including acts of God, labor disputes, and adverse weather, among others.
Common Commercial Lease Terms: Leases frequently impose stricter timing requirements and narrower definitions than the AIA standard:
Practical Solutions:
AIA Contract Term (A101-2017, §4.5): Provides space for inserting liquidated damages terms, but does not include a default mechanism or formula.
Common Commercial Lease Terms: Many ground and turnkey leases contain escalating LD provisions if the landlord misses the tenant delivery deadline. Common formulations include:
Practical Solutions:
AIA Contract Terms (A101-2017, §3.3.1; A201-2017, §9.8.1): A101 §3.3.1 allows the parties to insert a specific date or duration for substantial completion — typically used to drive the contractor’s project schedule and LDs. A201 §9.8.1 defines substantial completion as the stage when the work is sufficiently complete for the owner to occupy or use the project for its intended purpose. However, neither provision ensures the premises are actually ready for tenant buildout, turnover, or opening under the lease.
Common Commercial Lease Terms: Leases often define substantial completion with greater specificity than the AIA, tying it to a fixed construction completion date and detailed delivery conditions (e.g., CO issued, utilities connected, storefront and HVAC complete). Substantial completion may be defined to contemplate delaying substantial completion where tenant’s early access or failure to timely respond hinders landlord’s work. Many leases require tenant walkthrough approval and provide remedies for late delivery, such as rent deferral or shifting opening covenants. Common examples include:
Practical Solutions:
AIA Contract Term (A201-2017, §3.5.1): The contractor warrants that all materials and workmanship will be free of defects and in accordance with the contract documents for a period of one year following substantial completion. This is a default provision in the AIA A201 general conditions and forms the baseline warranty period for core and shell construction.
Common Commercial Lease Terms: Many leases require a one-year warranty on landlord’s delivery work, but also include additional protections for the tenant. These often include assignment of contractor and subcontractor warranties, third-party enforcement rights, and operational guarantees for HVAC, MEP, and life safety systems. Typical provisions include:
Practical Solutions:
AIA Contract Terms (A101-2017, §9.1; A201-2017, §1.1.1): A101 §9.1 requires that any drawings, exhibits, or other materials be specifically listed as “contract documents” in order to be binding on the parties. A201 §1.1.1 defines the contract documents collectively, but similarly requires proper enumeration and referencing. Without clear incorporation, critical delivery standards, scope requirements, or milestone expectations may not be enforceable against the general contractor.
Common Commercial Lease Terms: Leases often attach and define critical construction-related documents, including:
These documents are typically binding on the landlord—but unless they are expressly referenced in the GC contract, they may not be enforceable against the contractor.
Practical Solutions:
Construction documents don’t exist in a vacuum, and neither do leases. The AIA A101 and A201 are downstream agreements that must align with the upstream obligations already embedded in leases, loan documents, and development agreements. Developers and landlords can reduce negotiation time and avoid future conflict by incorporating AIA terms early and recognizing where industry-standard provisions reflect accepted market positions.
For developers and owners, that means ensuring internal teams and outside counsel are working from the same playbook. A contractor may meet every term in the AIA contract — but if those terms aren’t reconciled with the lease, the project can still miss the mark. To avoid that disconnect, build alignment early — and revisit it often.
For questions about aligning construction documents with upstream agreements, contact the authors or your regular Nelson Mullins contact.
Jake Carroll advises clients in the construction, manufacturing, and real estate industries on commercial transactions, complex disputes, and strategic risk management. He is the co-author of the Georgia Construction Law Handbook, a leading treatise published annually, and previously served as Chair of the Construction Law Section of the Atlanta Bar Association (2022–2023). A core focus of his practice is negotiating and structuring construction and design contracts, with an emphasis on enforcement, risk allocation, and alignment with the broader legal and commercial framework of a project—ensuring consistency across disciplines from development and financing through delivery and turnover.
Emily McClendon represents developers, investors, and lenders in the acquisition, financing, and development of commercial real estate projects across asset classes. Her practice includes drafting and negotiating complex lease, loan, and development agreements, with a particular focus on ground leases, site development, and landlord-side retail leasing. She brings a practical, detail-oriented approach to managing transactions from term sheet to closing.
These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.