February 13, 2020Four Nelson Mullins Attorneys Ranked in Chambers Global 2020 Guide
November 15, 2019
The NC legislature reconvened for regular session this week with top priority being placed on congressional redistricting. A three-judge panel ruled last month that 2020 congressional elections could not be held in NC using the current Republican-drawn maps as they represent “extreme partisan gerrymandering.” The panel issued a preliminary injunction requiring the state legislature to redraw the current congressional districts prior to the scheduled March 3, 2020 primaries, otherwise risk the primaries being pushed back until later in the year. House and Senate Redistricting committees have been working over the past two weeks on a new version of a congressional map. On Thursday, HB1029 (“Congress 2020”) passed the House along party lines. The bill includes a newly drawn congressional map that Republicans say will address the partisan gerrymandering concerns expressed in the panel’s ruling. The new map would likely adjust the state’s congressional representation from 10-3 to 8-5 in favor of the GOP. Congressional districts 4 (incumbent George Holding) and 6 (incumbent Mark Walker) would likely flip from Republican to Democrat. During bill debate on the floor, the Democrats argued the new map still does not provide proper balance between the parties. Minority party members said for the map to be fair, the districts should be drawn to reflect 6-7, 7-6 or 6-6-1 balance in representation. HB1029 is in Senate Redistricting and Elections Committee this morning.
The NC House passed HJR1026, “Adjournment Resolution,” Thursday, although many Democrats voted against the motion. House Minority Leader, Darren Jackson, spoke against the resolution, telling fellow-members that his objection to adjournment related to the legislature’s failure to pass pay raises for teachers. Jackson commented that the House and Senate should not be leaving Raleigh without addressing that piece of business. Republicans issued a press release in response that highlighted comments from SEANC (State Employees Association of NC) leaders criticizing the Governor and Democrats for their lack of support and fairness toward state employees who are also deserving of pay increases. Despite the back-and-forth from both sides, any additional action related to the comprehensive state budget or subsequent mini-budgets will most likely have to wait until January. At the end of October, a Joint Resolution (SJR694) was passed allowing for the legislature to reconvene in November and again in January, with specific provisions as to items approved for business during each regular session. Per the Joint Resolution, veto overrides are limited to the January session, thus a Senate attempt at overriding the Governor’s veto of HB966 (the budget bill) will have to wait until January. That session is also approved for consideration of conference reports – this may be an opportunity for the legislature to make attempts at additional mini-budgets. For clarification, HJR1026 merely adjourns the legislature from this November regular session. All other provisions outlined in SJR694 still apply.
Who, When, Where?
Candidate filing for most 2020 contests will begin on December 2nd at noon, and by all indications, there will be plenty of contenders tossing their hats into the ring to vie for some of North Carolina’s highest posts. While many new faces are making a jump onto the bigger political stage, some very familiar ones are just changing lanes. For that reason, you almost need a flowchart to keep track! With the March 3rd primaries just around the corner, the fields are getting packed. Here are some of the notable races to watch (keep in mind, filing period is Dec. 2-20; this list is guaranteed to change and updates will be provided):
This is just the tip of the iceberg, as 2020 promises to be an exciting year for politics in the Old North State!
These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.