Oct. 27, 2020
The Alabama Supreme Court issued a Certificate of Judgment on Friday overruling Equivest Financial, LLC’s application for rehearing regarding the Court's June 26, 2020 decision that held that a 2013 Bessemer tax sale occurring inside the courthouse — and not on the front steps of the courthouse as required by Ala. Code § 40-10-15 — was void. For more information about the initial holding, you can select this link.
Following Equivest’s application for rehearing, multiple entities – including the National Tax Lien Association, Inc., Association of Alabama Tax Sale Administrators, Birmingham and Gadsden Land Bank Authorities, and the Association of County Commissions of Alabama – submitted amici (“Friend of the Court”) briefs in support of Equivest’s application for rehearing. The amici briefs that were submitted pointed out the various practical implications that could result from the Court’s decision. (1)
The most obvious practical implication that could result from this decision is the voiding of an untold number of tax sales all over the state of Alabama.
To that end, it is pertinent that tax sale purchasers in Alabama examine their portfolios to determine which properties still need quiet title and ejectment actions initiated. Complaints initiating a civil action for quiet title and ejectment will now differ as certain information will need to be included in order to appropriately protect the tax sale purchaser in the event the delinquent taxpayer attempts to invalidate the tax sale based upon this recent decision. Tax sale purchasers will also need to confirm tax sales are being conducted on the actual “front steps” of the courthouse. In light of this decision, even tax sales being conducted online as a result of the novel Coronavirus could be voided.
Nelson Mullins, who submitted an amicus brief on behalf of the National Tax Lien Association, has been continuing to monitor this case and the issues it potentially creates. Please contact Matt Abee, Randy Saunders, or Megan Ware-Fitzgerald from the Tax Lien Resolution and Litigation Team at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP should you have any questions about the Court’s decision, questions about any practical implications caused by the decision, and/or assistance in initiating an action to quiet title in light of the Court’s decision.
(1) The same Justices that dissented to the original Opinion, also dissented to the Court’s decision to overrule the Application for Rehearing. Under Alabama appellate procedure, there is a question about whether the opinion is binding precedent on the lower courts in Alabama. Regardless of whether the opinion is legally binding, it is likely that trial court judges across the state will adhere to the Supreme Court’s reasoning in invalidating numerous other tax sales.
These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.