EPA issues Coal Ash Proposal
Rule may redefine products used in construction and road building
On June 21, EPA published its proposal to regulate coal combustion residuals (CCRs) under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). CCR is the technical term for coal-ash waste from coal-fired power plants. There are a number of coal-ash impoundments across the country and a spill in Tennessee in 2008 that resulted in major damage prompted EPA to propose stricter regulatory controls.
There is tension over new regulations that could define the ash as “hazardous” because the ash is currently used in concrete, wallboard, roads, and for mine reclamation. Advocates for beneficial reuse of coal ash argue that defining coal ash as “hazardous” will reduce its value because of the stigma and because of increased costs associated with tighter regulatory controls.
EPA’s proposal calls for comment on two different approaches. One approach is for EPA to set strict disposal criteria. The other approach is to label the ash as nonhazardous and leave enforcement to the states.
Analysis for SBCRR Subscribers
EPA does not believe that their proposal will significantly impact a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, the EPA bypassed the requirement for convening a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel prior to proposing the rule. EPA’s rationale is that 26% of electric utility plants (sector regulated under the proposal) are small entities (municipal governments, companies, and cooperatives). EPA expects those electric utilities to experience new regulatory costs of less than one percent of annual revenues.
Unfortunately, EPA is only required to analyze the rule’s direct impact on utilities. The agency’s analysis stops short of estimating the rise in cost for building materials and other costs that represent “indirect impacts” of EPA’s rulemaking. Small business stakeholders should advise the EPA on how its proposal may result in increased costs that cannot be shouldered by small firms.
Key Documents
- EPA’s website on Coal Combustion Residuals: click here
- EPA's Proposed rule: click here
- News article on EPA’s proposal: click here
Agency Outreach
EPA is holding webinars in August on the agency’s plans to regulate coal ash. The webinars will include an explanation of the proposal by EPA staff, guidance on how to give official public comment, and an opportunity to address questions from participants. The webinars are not part of the official public comment process.
- Thursday, August 5, 2010, 2:00 pm-3:30 pm - Environmental/Health, Environmental Justice, and Community impacts
- Thursday, August 12, 2010, 2:00 pm-3:30 pm - Industry and Beneficial Use impacts
- To register for the webinars: click here
Upcoming Rules
OSHA to Revise its On-Site Consultation Program
OSHA submitted changes to its On-Site Consultation Program to OMB for review on May 27, 2010. OSHA is proposing to clarify the instances when safety violations discovered during a voluntary consultation visit need to be referred to enforcement.
Analysis for SBCRR Subscribers:
OSHA’s On-Site Consultation Program is a valuable resource for small businesses that need advice from OSHA without fear of enforcement. Changes to the program are likely to ignite concerns by small business that new consultation requirements will change the voluntary nature of the program into a referral system for inspections and enforcement. It would be unfortunate if changes to the program scare off small business participation. When the proposal is issued, small business stakeholders are encouraged to advise the agency on their experiences in the On-Site Consultation Program and how it can be improved. OSHA will benefit from hearing about the importance of keeping the On-Site Consultation Program activities separate from OSHA’s inspection and enforcement activities.
Key Documents
- Article on the benefits of OSHA’s consultation program for small business: click here
About SBCRR
The Small Business Coalition for Regulatory Relief (SBCRR) is a coalition made up of small businesses and supporting organizations that are interested in federal regulatory developments. SBCRR provides coalition members with regular updates on regulatory proposals and opportunities for small business to provide input that can positively impact final agency decisions.
SBCRR Subscribers receive information and analysis in advance of the newsletter's web-posting. Additionally, subscribers receive analysis on regulatory proposals, regulatory alerts, and information tailored to their membership or interests. For more information on the cost and availability of an SBCRR subscription, please click here or contact Tom.Sullivan@nelsonmullins.com.
Contact:
Tom Sullivan
202.545.2909
tom.sullivan@nelsonmullins.com
The articles published in this newsletter are intended only to provide general information on the subjects covered. The contents should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Readers should consult with legal counsel to obtain specific legal advice based on particular situations.