|
|
April 14, 2003 For more information contact: 404-817-6133 404-817-6247 404-817-6257 404-817-6170 |
|
After a beautiful weekend, Legislators returned to the
Capitol to tackle more of the people’s business.
Today, it would appear that no resolution is in sight regarding the
State’s Budget for FY 2004. Now,
more than ever, rumors are circulating about a Special Session.
The Senate kicked off its day at Floor News
The House worked steadily on its calendar.
Here are a few noteworthy items: Sen. Carol Jackson’s bill dealing with protections for peace officers made it to the House Floor. SB 20, which mirrors a House bill by Rep. Morris, establishes a felony charge for instances where a person, who is infected individual with HIV or hepatitis, uses their bodily fluids (such as urine, semen, saliva, etc.) as a weapon to attack an unsuspecting member of law enforcement while the law enforcement personnel are in performance of their jobs. Penalties for this crime would be imprisonment of between five and twenty years in addition to the person’s existing sentence. SB 20 passed by a vote of 156 to 7. One of the Governor’s bills also
made it out of the House by a vote of 151 to 11.
This was SB 205 which deals with “meth labs.”
Methamphetamines are a rapidly growing part of
The Senate had a lengthy calendar, but recessed for lunch and returned
around ·
HB 236, Rep. Golick’s bill, which re-defines racketeering
activity in · HB 422, Rep. Richardson’s bill amending income tax credits for businesses creating full-time jobs, also cleared. This adds a new Code Section at 48-7-40.24 so that an income tax credit for full-time employee jobs is created for a business or the headquarters of a business which is engaged in manufacturing. This would not include retail businesses. It would require regular work of 35 or more hours per week for each job and an investment requirement of the company so that be the close of the sixth taxable year following the withholding start-date a minimum of $450 million in qualified investment property would have to be purchased or acquired by the business enterprise to be used with the project. A Committee Substitute was passed by a vote of 54 to zero. ·
HB 492, another piece of legislation by Rep. Richardson and
similar to the one mentioned above, gained passage by a vote of 50 to 3.
The bill passed by Senate Finance Committee Substitute with a Floor
Amendment. The Floor Amendment made
by Sens. Price and Johnson dealt with the increase of the amount of the
retirement income exclusion for State income tax purposes.
In taxable years beginning on or after · HB 544, a bill by Rep. Jamieson, was presented and passed without discussion or changes. This deals with monthly income tax returns and increasing thresholds. The passage by Committee Substitute was 49 to zero. ·
HB 597, Rep. Jackson’s legislation for the Secretary of State,
was held under Rule 142 after a good deal of discussion and several amendments.
The bill basically reduces the numbers of persons on the various
licensing boards overseen by the Secretary of State, which would lower annual
costs by approximately $100,000. It
only reduces the numbers where boards are currently more than five persons.
Persons who would be removed would be either the longest serving board
member or the first person in alphabetical order.
There were attempts to strike the portion concerning the psychologists
board by Sen. Steve Thompson. Additional
changes were proposed by the boards of forestry and accounting.
Sen. Seabaugh had proposed changing the board of accounting as it
currently has a representative on its board who is a registered public
accountant (there are only five of these persons in the State with this
“RPA” designation; Sen. Seabaugh
stated that he was committed to working with the State so as to perhaps
“grandfather” those five individuals in as “CPAs.”)Sen. Eric Johnson
proposed that the Governor have the power to decide who on each of the boards
must be eliminated rather than some other formula. In the end, Sen. Johnson’s
amendment passed. Due to the length
of the amendment, the bill had to remain; thus Rule 143 was invoked.
Sen. Connie Stokes spoke in opposition to the bill. New Legislation
HB 1000 – Rep. Stephens has proposed amending the Chatham
County Hospital Authority appointments. This
is local legislation as approved on This would allow nine members to serve six year terms,
staggered, in order to provide for the expiration of the terms of one third of
the membership at any one time. Chaham
County Commissioners would select the members of the authority by a majority
vote and shall not be prohibited from appointing members of the county
commission to serve as members of the Authority.
Members of the Chatham County Hospital Authority in office on HB 1001 – Rep. Bannister and others authored this measure
amending O.C.G.A. § 34-8-195 in order to provide that employees of employee
leasing companies and professional employer organizations shall be presumed to
have voluntarily left employment without good cause if the employees do not
contact the employee leasing companies and professional employer organizations
for reassignment upon the completion of an assignment. HB 1004 – Rep. Bordeaux has offered along with some
colleagues this bill to amend Chapter 9 of Title 31 in an effort to deal with
the abortion issue and consent for surgical and medical treatment.
The bill would enact the Woman’s Right to Know Act and provide that
provisions relating to consent for surgical and medical treatment would apply to
abortion procedures. It
specifically amends O.C.G.A. §
“Except as otherwise provided in this Code section, any person who
undergoes any surgical procedure under general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, or
major regional anesthesia, any person who undergoes an abortion, or any person
who undergoes amniocentesis diagnostic procedure or a diagnostic procedure which
involves the intravenous or intraductal injection of a contrast material must
consent to such procedure and shall be informed in general terms the following: 1) A diagnosis of the patient’s condition requiring such proposed surgical or diagnostic procedure; 2) The nature and purpose of such proposed surgical or diagnostic procedure; 3) The material risks generally recognized and accepted by reasonably prudent physicians of infection, allergic reaction, severe loss of blood, loss or loss of function of any limb or organ, paralysis or partial paralysis, paraplegia or quadriplegia, disfiguring scar, brain damage, cardiac arrest, or death involved in such proposed surgical or diagnostic procedure which, if disclosed to a reasonably prudent person in the patient’s position, could reasonably be expected to cause such prudent person to decline such proposed surgical or diagnostic procedure on the basis of the material risk of injury that could result from such proposed surgical or diagnostic procedure; 4) The likelihood of success of such proposed surgical or diagnostic procedure; 5) The practical alternatives to such proposed surgical or diagnostic procedure which are generally recognized and accepted by reasonably prudent physicians; and 6) The prognosis of the patient’s condition if such proposed surgical or diagnostic procedure is rejected.” HR 766 – Reps. Broome and Sholar have co-authored this
Resolution commending Committee News
Senate Appropriations Committee
HB 526, the bill proposed to amend Chapter 8 of Title 31 in order to
enact the “Nursing Home Provider Fee Act,” cleared the Committee.
This provides that a fee be imposed on nursing homes in order that the
State may obtain financial participation from
the federal government. This
would apply to the nursing homes which serve the medically indigent.
It would apply to those homes which have disproportionate numbers of the
medically indigent which means the patient days attributable to medically
indigent residents account for more than 15% of the nursing home’s total
patient days during a 12-month period. Medicare
program patient days are not included. There
would be a segregated account established within the Indigent Care Trust Fund
for the deposit of these provider fees. All
revenues raised through these provider fees would be credited to the segregated
account, within the Indigent Care Trust Fund, and would be invested in the same
manner as authorized for investing other monies in the State’s treasury.
Contributions and transfers to the Indigent Care Trust Fund pursuant to
provisions outlined in O.C.G.A. § 31-8-153 and O.C.G.A. § 31-8-153.1 would not
be deposited into the segregated account. Fees
collected would be dedicated and used for the sole purpose of obtaining federal
financial participation for medical assistance payments to nursing homes that
disproportionately serve these medically indigent.
The provider fees would be quarterly; the fees would be reported on a
form prepared by the Department of Community Health and submitted no later than
the 30th day following the end of the quarter.
Initial payments are due no later than July 30, 2003 and would be based
on patient days for the quarter ending June 30, 2003. The General Assembly is
authorized to appropriate the State funds to the Department of Community Health
for use in any fiscal year all revenues dedicated and deposited into this
segregated account; any appropriation from the segregated account for any
purpose, except for serving the medically indigent in nursing homes, shall be
void. This will require Centers for
Medicare Services waiver approval.
Senate Health and Human Services Committee HB 697, the bill by Rep. Gardner
which proposes to provide for a patient’s right to independent review when
that person is covered by the State’s health insurance plan, passed out of the
Committee. This follows the
exhaustion of the Department of Community Health’s process for review of
treatment and/or coverage disputes which a person might have with the State
Health Benefit Plan. The bill was
brought by Rep. Gardner at the request of a Georgia Tech professor covered by
the State’s plan. There will be
virtually no costs to the State to allow for this independent review.
This change to the law will be inserted in O.C.G.A. § 33-20A-31 in order
to change who an “eligible enrollee” is under definitions to also include an
employee as defined in O.C.G.A. § 45-18-1(2). HB 318 was also before the
Committee. This measure was drafted
by Rep. McClinton and carried in the Senate by Sen. Unterman.
This bill would enact the “Adult Day Center Licensure Act” in order
that the Department of Human Resources could promulgate rules and regulations to
cover the operations of adult day centers. The
bill is modeled after the childcare licensing law.
The bill is supported by the Council on Aging and others.
An effort was made by Rep. Sally Harrell to add language to the bill,
similar to her bill HB 935, to create an advisory council, within the Division
of Aging in the Department of Human Resources, on drug access issues for senior
citizens. There was dissent over
this proposal by Sens. Preston Smith and Don Balfour.
The Committee split on their vote on whether or not to add Rep.
Harrell’s language; the Chairman broke the tie so as to not allow the
amendment to ‘ride’ this bill. Thus,
Sen. Preston Smith made a motion to pass the bill by Committee Substitute which
carried. The bill will add a new
Article 7 to Chapter 6 of Title 49. HB 183 was before this Committee
and passed without any changes. This
legislation by Rep. Borders proposes to expand the exception to the misdemeanor
of tattooing near the eye. Such
could only be performed by a physician or an osteopath or a person under the
general supervision of a licensed physician or osteopath.
This change comes in O.C.G.A. § 16-12-5.
A first offense is a misdemeanor; a subsequent violation will be a
misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.
This is to address issues where persons in tattoo parlors are performing
these procedures which in turn are causing eye infections.
The Georgia Society of Ophthalmologists worked with Rep. Borders on the
bill but does not wish for any changes to occur to the bill.
Apparently, there is a concern that this bill could be used as a vehicle
for optometrists to alter their scope of practice.
Sen. Stokes stated that all bills were subject to being perfected,
basically, indicating that amendments might occur on the Senate Floor. HB 594 also cleared out of the
Committee without changes. This is
the bill amending Article 1 of Chapter 18 of Title 45 so that retirees of
community service boards. with at least 10 years of actual service and after
they have attained the age of 60, can participate in the State Health Benefit
Plan.
Senate Judiciary Committee It reported out HB 708 which amends O.C.G.A. § 45-1-4 regarding complaints or information regarding fraud, waste, and abuse in state programs and operations. This is one of the ‘whistleblower’ bills. It establishes definitions for ‘retaliate’ or ‘retaliation’ and prohibits an employer from making, adopting or enforcing any policy or practice which prevents an public employee from disclosing or threatening to disclose a violation of or non-compliance with a law, rule, or regulation to either a supervisor or a government agency. The bill currently contains language that states that this new law would not apply to institutions or facilities permitted or licensed by Title 31. |
|