|
|
April 10, 2003 For more information contact: 404-817-6133 404-817-6247 404-817-6257 404-817-6170 |
|
Greetings from the Gold Dome!
Days are winding down now; tempers are flaring as well.
Debates over the Flag and taxes are heated.
Today, Sen. Mary Squires went to the Well in disgust, and in tears, over
the Flag debate in the House. She
even called the Governor a racist. Needless
to say, all were shaken by this turn of events.
Some question the actual healing taking place.
Here are some other highlights from Day 35: Floor News
Other than personal points of privilege – such as that by Sen. Squires,
the Senate also made its day rather short. Here are a couple of the bills it
passed: ·
HB 54, Rep. Childers’ bill relating to who may operate an eye
bank (basically a non-profit entity), cleared the Senate by a vote of 47 to
zero. ·
HB 177, the bill which amends provisions concerning real estate
appraisers and brokers, also cleared the Senate by a vote of 43 to zero. The House did its business rather
quickly. ·
SB 37 which proposes to establish guidelines for the operation of
electric personal assistive mobility devices (EPMADs) (i.e. the Segway and other
electric driven devices which average an output of around one horsepower)
cleared the House by a vote of 152 to 4. These
vehicles would be allowed on all sidewalks which are able to accommodate
persons with disabilities.
Speed limits would be imposed: 7 mph.
Additionally, operators would be required to yield the right of way to
any pedestrians. These EPMADs would
only be allowed on roadways with a designated bicycle lane or which have a
maximum allowed speed of 35 mph or less. When riding EPMADs on roadways, the
operators must travel with traffic and be limited to a maximum speed of 15 mph.
Rear reflective gear must be part of these vehicles equipment. ·
Another bill dealing with the practice of optometry has cleared
the House. Persons practicing
optometry without a license, if SB is passed by the Senate, will face greater
penalties. The House raised the
penalty from a misdemeanor to a felony. The
bill passed by a vote of 142 to 6. This
is the same penalty for some other professions – such as the practice of
medicine, dentistry, and podiatry. ·
HR 261 passed which proposes the formation of a House Study
Committee to look at New Legislation
SR 416 – Sen. Levetan and others have proposed creating
the Senate Hospital Indigent Care Funding Study Committee.
This will look at the State’s community hospitals which provide
indigent and charity care and incur bad debt charges from the care rendered.
It will look at the payments provided by Medicare and Medicaid which do
not cover the costs of treating patients. The
Committee will look at sustained funding of indigent care through a variety of
revenue sources such as county funding, fees, and special taxes and other
revenue sources. It will also look
at the PeachCare for Kids Program in an effort to find ways to cover Committee News
Senate Insurance and Labor Committee HB 598 was reported out by
Substitute. This amends O.C.G.A. §
33-1-9 so as to provide that a person is committing insurance fraud when, as an
agent or representative, he or she solicits, negotiates, procures, or
effectuates insurance coverage on behalf of an insurer who is not authorized to
do business in Georgia or takes certain actions with regard to such insurance.
Such things would include soliciting, negotiating, procuring or
effectuating any contract relating to benefits or services; disseminating
information as to coverage or rates; forwarding applications; delivering
policies or contracts; etc. House Insurance Committee ·
SB 166 was presented by Sen. Lamutt and passed without changes or
discussion. This provides for a
minimum non-forfeiture rate of 1 1/2 % on individual deferred annuities.
There is also a sunset provision for this provision. ·
SB 96, a bill by Sen. Unterman and being handled by Rep. Graves,
also passed by Committee Substitute without additional changes and little
questioning. This bill requires that
health plans pay for off-label drug use for life threatening and chronic
diseases or conditions. A new Code
Section is inserted in O.C.G.A. § 33-24-59.11. ·
SB 329 by Sen. Seabaugh would create a Consumer Driven Health
Plan. This would allow the
establishment of a spending account of first dollar spending for coverage.
There would be a secondary benefit for co-pays, deductibles, and
stop-loss. There were a number of
questions as to whether such policies were an effort to write health insurance
without including the insurance mandates (for things such as mastectomy, cancer
clinical trials, etc.). There were
also questions concerning its portability if an employee leaves his or her job
with this type of coverage. Rep.
Keen explained that these plans are currently being marketed.
James Purcell, with the Georgia Healthcare Leadership Council, rose in
support of this legislation as big employers do this routinely.
This, per Mr. Purcell, will allow small employers to also offer this as a
benefit. Aubrey Villines, another lobbyist for a number of groups including the
Georgia Optometric Society, opposed the bill.
Linda Lowe raised concerns about the section relating to stop-loss
coverage and covered mandated benefits. Tom
Bauer rose with concerns over the bill and asked that the Committee move
cautiously. Chairman Lord asked if
any opposition had been raised on the Senate side; there had not.
This did not please Chairman Lord. The
bill passed without changes. ·
SB 156 also cleared out of the Committee without changes.
Sen. Shafer presented this bill which relates to insuring employees with
life insurance – ‘key man’ insurance.
Corporations have resorted to insuring more than just key persons in a
corporation. Thus, this bill states
that if an employer purchases insurance on an employee, then the corporation
must get the employee’s consent. Additionally,
if an employer is purchasing life insurance on employees’ children, this will
be prohibited. ·
SB 282 by Sen. Cheeks also passed.
This provides that if a person working for the State is eligible for the
State’s health plan but does not immediately take such because of being
covered by a federal plan (such as because of military service) and sometime
later the federal plan ceases to operate or function, then that employee may be
covered by the State’s plan. Proof
of eligibility would be required. This
too passed. Senate Judiciary Committee
HB 770, the Speaker’s bill on indigent defense, cleared out of the
Senate Committee by Substitute. House Committee on Governmental Affairs This Committee passed by Substitute SB 71, which amends O.C.G.A. § 43-10A-7 relating to the exemption from licensure for persons who are helping with disaster relief services. Such persons who get the exemption will be professional counselors, social workers, and marriage and family therapists who are currently licensed to practice a specialty in another jurisdiction and who are practicing just to alleviate the impact on the persons affected by the disaster. |
|