|
|
February 13, 2002 For more information contact: 404-817-6133 404-817-6247 404-817-6257 404-817-6170 | ||
|
Today, was day 18 of the 2002 Session. Rumors were
circulating about a possible recess for both Friday, February 15, 2002 and
Monday, February 18, 2002. It is likely that the agreement will be made to stand
in recess on Friday. The biggest excitement (or dread) was the news on the FY
2002 Supplemental Budget. The House Appropriations Committee voted on the
proposed recommendations today, but the news was grim in the face of the newly
announced sales tax shortfall. More news on the budget items follows. Today, a
physician with the Southeastern Permanente Medical Group, Dr. Bruce Perry,
served as "Doctor of the Day."
Floor News In the Senate, Sen. Steve Thompson, the Governor’s Floor Leader, presented SB 394 to increase the numbers of persons serving on the Department of Human Resources’ Board in an effort to include one such person from each of the Congressional Districts. This addresses the increased population of Georgia and the two newly created Congressional Districts. Presently, there are 15 persons serving on the Board; this measure brings the total number of persons to 17. The bill passed by a vote of 52 to zero. The Governor’s bill on Bioterrorism initiatives also was a point of discussion but the bill was not voted upon and dropped to the bottom of the Senate’s calendar. Sen. Seth Harp mentioned that a presentation aired on Georgia Public Television on the matter and encouraged each of the Senators to view such. The Governor’s bill, SB 385, is projected to reappear tomorrow. Newly Introduced Legislation HB 1364 – Rep. Rice and others have introduced this bill in an effort to create within the Department of Law, the Obscenity and Pornography Complaints Ombudsman in Article 2, of Chapter 15 of Title 45. This has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee. HB 1369 – Rep. Boggs and others have offered this amendment to O.C.G.A. § 33-23-12 in an effort to provide a limited license for retail vendors of communications equipment (handsets, pagers, personal digital assistants, portable computers, automatic answering devices, cellular telephones, batteries, and other devices or their accessories used to originate or receive communications signals or service for individual customer use) and their employees who sell insurance coverages for the loss, theft, mechanical failure, or malfunction of or damage to communications equipment. The vendor would file a "written application for such limited license, signed by the applicant or an officer of the applicant, on such form or forms, and supplements thereto, and containing such information as the Commissioner may prescribe." This bill has been sent to the House Insurance Committee for review. HB 1374 – Rep. Buck has introduced another bill relating to open public records. This bill proposes an amendment to O.C.G.A. § 50-18-72 concerning when public disclosure of public records is not required if records relate to local governmental employees. Such information which would be kept private would include "records that reveal the home address, the home telephone number, or the social security number of or insurance or medical information about employees of any local government." This has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee. HB 1380 – This bill, authored by Rep. Bulloch and others, proposes to amend the Code at 15-14-6 relating to expenses and travel allowances for court reporters in an effort to provide for payment of premiums pertaining to certain programs for insurance, contracts of indemnity, or programs of self insurance for reimbursing court reporters for certain fees and expenses. It also has proposed amendments to O.C.G.A. § 45-9-1 regarding liability arising out of official duties and reimbursement of legal fees of public officers and employees in connection with unsuccessful criminal prosecutions and professional disciplinary proceedings – it would allow for provisions in the law while such reporters were acting as official court reporters for superior courts. This has been sent to the House Judiciary Committee. HB 1400 – Rep. Skipper and Rep. Childers have authored this amendment to Title 37 concerning the provisions for transportation for the mentally ill, mentally retarded, and alcoholic and drug dependent individuals who are patients or clients in a facility The law still requires that a female patient be accompanied by another female, who is not a patient, unless the female patient is accompanied by her husband, father, adult brother, or adult son. Further, the bill gives the facility discretion in determining the type of vehicle to safely transport the patient and to make necessary arrangements for that transportation. It will allow physician restraints, in accordance with O.C.G.A. § 37-3-165. It will also allow expenses for transportation to be billed to the patient, if the transportation is not provided by the county sheriff. HB 1402 – The Governor’s bill to create a prestige license plate for supporting certain breast cancer related programs for the medically indigent and to dedicate the revenue derived from the sales of those tags to the Indigent Care Trust Fund, as authorized by Article III, Section IX, Paragraph VI(i) of the State’s Constitution, has been introduced again. The bill will be engrossed tomorrow in an effort to prevent other types of tags to be created. SB 451 – Sen. Jackson’s amendments to the Hospital Lien law found in Title 44 which would provide that hospital lines are liens against patients’ causes of action and not the actual patients nor their property or assets has now been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. SB 458 – Sen. Nadine Thomas along with Sen. Tom Price and Sen. Ed Harbison have proposed an amendment to Article 1 of Chapter 24 of Title 33 relating to the requirement of a health benefit policy to cover off-label prescription drug use for life-threatening or chronic or disabling conditions or diseases. Life-threatening is defined as either 1) diseases or conditions with potentially fatal outcomes, where the end point of clinical intervention is survival, or 2) diseases or conditions where the likelihood of death is high unless the course of the disease is interrupted. Further, the bill states that no policy shall "limit or exclude coverage for a drug on the basis that the drug is prescribed for a use that is different from the use for which that drug has been approved for marketing by the federal Food and Drug Administration, provided that all of the following conditions have been met: 1) the drug has been approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration; 2(A) the drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed health care professional for the treatment of a life-threatening disease or condition; or (B) the drug is prescribed by a contracting licensed healthcare professional for the treatment of a chronic and seriously debilitating disease or condition, the drug is medically necessary to treat that disease or condition, and the drug is on the insurer’s formulary, if any; and 3) the drug has been recognized for treatment of that disease or condition by one of the following: (A) the American Medical Association Drug Evaluations; (B) the American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information; or (C) the United States Pharmacopoeia Dispensing Information, Volume 1, "Drug Information for the Health Care Professional"; or (D) two articles from major peer reviewed medical journals that present data supporting the proposed off-label use or uses as generally safe and effective unless there is clear and convincing contradictory evidence presented in a major peer reviewed medical journal." Further the bill would require that the "prescriber" would have to submit to the insurer any documentation supporting compliance with the requirements mentioned. The insurer would have to cover any medically necessary services associated with the administration of the drug, subject to the conditions of the contract. The health insurer would not be required to cover 1) the treatment of a condition or disease that is excluded under the terms of the policy; 2) an experimental drug not approved by the FDA; or 3) a drug treatment by a drug not listed on the health benefit plan’s formulary. Finally, the benefits would not be subject to the same annual deductibles or co-insurance established for all other covered benefits within a given health policy. SB 463 – Sen. Gingrey and others have proposed the amendment to O.C.G.A. § 49-5-273 regarding the creation and operation of the PeachCare for Kids Program. This would provide for healthcare coverage for children from conception through age 18 in families with incomes below 235% of the Federal poverty level. Budget News Rep. Larry Walker, House Majority Leader, presented the recommendations from the "Green Door" Committee to the House Appropriations Committee, noting that there were no "special projects." There may be "special projects" left in the Budget which were funded last year but no new projects. Basically, the situation is grim – especially due to the news released in the media this morning about the need to "find" another $80 million. Here are some of the highlights of the recommendations which do include an additional $21 million in the bond package: Court of Appeals:
Superior Courts:
Community Affairs:
Community Health:
Education:
Georgia Bureau of Investigation:
Governor’s Office:
Human Resources:
Human Resources – Tobacco Dollars:
Industry, Trade and Tourism:
funds for the Georgia Shrimpers Association in the amount of $50,000 transfer of $150,000 from GA Technology Authority for the Connect Georgia Project Juvenile Justice:
[Note: a-c were ‘special projects’ funded in 2001.] Natural Resources:
Public Safety:
Board of Regents (parts A and B):
Revenue:
Soil and Water Conservation Commission:
Technical and Adult Education:
Bond – Sinking Fund:
Committee Activity As for the 2003 Budget, Rep. Sinkfield’s Subcommittee on Human Development from House Appropriations Committee met this afternoon to hear more from Commissioner Jim Martin. Basically, he went through each item in the Governor’s recommendations on the FY 2003 Budget to the Subcommittee. The House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee studying SB 214 met this afternoon to hear more about the database bill which Sens. Lamutt and Polak have introduced. After much discussion concerning the substitute, when it came time to call the question on whether to vote the bill up or down out of the Subcommittee – no motion was made. Thus, the bill will be held in the "busom" of the Subcommittee. It is believed that Sen. Polak is trying to perfect the bill and asked that the Subcommittee hold the bill. It would appear that the Georgia Chamber of Commerce is still neutral on the legislation, due to the fact that it is still unclear what impact such might have on business. Additionally, an entity known as CheckFree is opposed to the bill. In another Subcommittee meeting of the House Judiciary Committee, HB 1253, which is an amendment to last year’s re-write to the Uniform Commercial Code law, was up for consideration. This bill clarifies the letters of credit portion of the law to make it compliant with federal law concerning custom and practice of such. Additionally, it took up SB 253 which amends the law relating to limited liability companies. This bill also clarifies changes made in the 1999 amendments to the law. Both of these bills now move to the full House Judiciary Committee. In a crowded room today, the Senate Health and Human Services Committee met and took up HB 585 and SB 145. SB 145, which would prohibit private physicians’ offices from using a clinical lab employee in their offices, sailed out of Committee. We believe that the Medical Association of Georgia and others are still working on this bill. HB 585, presented by Rep. Graves, received the greatest amount of time and attention. HB 585 proposes to require that "pharmacy benefit managers or PBMs" would be required to be licensed as a pharmacy or pharmacist in Georgia if they were conducting any business other than processing pharmaceutical claims (such as drug selections, establishing formularies, drug utilization review, etc.). Wayne Oliver with the Georgia Pharmacy Association rose in support of this bill and asked that the Committee provide for regulation of these entities. He stated that his pharmacies were concerned that PBMs were making clinical decisions about healthcare and were coming between the pharmacist and the patient. He threatened that perhaps the Department of Insurance should be contacted about the issue. He claimed that decisions by PBMs may be far reaching. No other states are requiring PBMs to be licensed – Mr. Oliver stated that Georgia would be a leader and since the introduction of this bill in 2001, other states have similarly proposed such. There were several persons who testified such as Dr. Jay Kulkin, the former medical director of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia. He explained his interest in the bill and his expertise as a physician on a national PBM. Dr. Kulkin noted the economics of the uses of PBMS and explained that such entities make comparisons on drugs, review safety, efficacy, cost, etc. In his experience, physicians are consulted about such drug uses and help formulate recommendations based upon sound knowledge. He stressed that PBMs help with cost and quality of care. He also noted that the PBMs administer the actual health plan policies and were not practicing as pharmacies. The lobbyist for Express Scripts, the PBM for the State Health Benefit Plan, noted that another large PBM in Georgia was operated by Merck. His argument was that if a PBM is found to operating as a pharmacy, then the Attorney General can prosecute. Thus, there is no need for a new piece of legislation. After hearing the testimony, the bill was held for more information and study. The Senate Insurance and Labor Committee also met this afternoon and passed out HB 461 concerning an effort to amend Chapter 9 of Title 45 so as to provide temporary disability compensation for officially recognized or designated members of a legally organized volunteer fire department who are injured in the line of duty. Additionally, the Insurance and Labor Committee passed out Rep. Sally Harrell’s
bill, HB 525, relating to maternity benefit notices, which health plans must
provide to patients about their rights concerning hospital lengths of stay
following delivery of a baby. The health plan insurer must provide a notice to
the expectant mother, within 30 days "following the date the insurer first
learns that the expectant mother covered by the health benefit policy is
pregnant in substantially the following form:" NOTICE
The final bill the Committee addressed was SB 378, Sen. Price’s bill, which resulted from the Study Committee he chaired over the summer relating to exclusionary hospital contracting. The bill proposes to require that health plans obtain an acknowledgement from enrollees about the (1) number, mix, and distribution of providers; (2) the limitations on choice of providers; and (3) financial incentives provided to providers. A couple of amendments were made to the bill in Committee – the first was to eliminate any acceptance to these ‘limits’ by the enrollee and the second was to change the affirmative consent being requested to a signed acknowledgement that the enrollee has been provided information on the three areas of information. Finally, Sen. Brown noted that he would be holding SB 179 in the Committee, as the bill was originally scheduled for the agenda. SB 179, which relates to the disclosure of claims history by an insurer, had its language incorporated in SB 177. The House Health and Ecology Committee met and passed out the Subcommittee’s recommendation to HB 69. Rep. David Graves, the author of the bill, presented the bill which would establish a new group of professionals to be licensed in the State – this would be ‘clinical perfusionists’ (the persons who operate the heart-lung machines in open heart surgical procedures). According to Rep. Graves, there are only 93 clinical perfusionists in the State, and there is currently no available training in Georgia. This bill moves to the House Rules Committee for its consideration. Other SB 364, Sen. Walker’s changes to the Code relating to the Brain and Spinal Injury Trust Fund, crossed over to the House and has been sent to the Health and Ecology Committee. Additionally, SB 393, Sen. Meyer von Bremen’s amendment to Title 5 relating to appellate practices, has also crossed over to the House and is now in the House Judiciary Committee. |
|||