|
|
February 3, 2003 For more information contact: 404-817-6133 404-817-6247 404-817-6257 404-817-6170 |
|
Greetings from the Gold Dome!
Today, marked the 11th Legislative Day for the 2003 Session.
The day was rather short as Legislators did not convene until HB 220 – Rep. Channell's amendment to the timely payment
law in the Insurance Code, amending O.C.G.A. § 33-24-59.5, has been forwarded
to the House Insurance Committee for review.
This proposes not to allow interest penalties, paid by insurers to
hospitals or physicians, to apply towards the cap on benefits payable under the
policy. HB 228 – This is Rep. Borders' Bill which changes the
sales tax holiday legislation passed in 2002 so that the exemption provided in
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3 (75) shall apply only to sales from 12:01 a.m. on the first
Thursday of August and concluding at 12:00 Midnight on the first Sunday of
August each year. In an effort to
move this sales tax proposal along, a motion to engross this bill was made on
Friday. Items covered by this
exemption are: "(i) Articles of clothing and
footwear with a sales price of $100.00 or less per article of clothing or pair
of footwear, excluding accessories such as jewelry, handbags, umbrellas, items
intended primarily for use as athletic or sporting gear, eyewear, watches, and
watchbands; HB 259 – Rep. Channell has also introduced another bill
concerning timely payment of health benefits.
It is a duplicate of HB 220 as noted above, also amending O.C.G.A. §
33-24-59.5(c). It states:
"Each insurer shall pay to the insured or other person claiming
payments under the health benefit plan interest equal to 18 percent per annum on
the proceeds or benefits due under the terms of such plan for failure to comply
with subsection (b) of this Code section. No
amount of any such interest penalty shall be applied toward any cap on benefits
payable to the insured or other person claiming payments under the health
benefit plan." Committee News
House Banks and Banking Committee
In an effort to compromise, meetings had been held to work out some of
the lending community's concerns relating to the current Fair Lending Act and to
react to the consumer support for the bill.
Today, it would appear those efforts caved as proposed new language
was not included in the bill which the Committee passed. Senate Insurance and Labor Committee
In a packed Committee meeting, SB 50 was presented to Chairman Lamutt and
his Committee. There were more than
20 persons who testified about the proposed Georgia Consumer Choice of Benefits
Health Insurance Plan Act. The Bill
proposes to allow employers to choose group and individual health insurance
plans which are more affordable and flexible than standard market policies of
accident and sickness insurance. This
is an effort to increase the availability of health insurance coverage and lower
the numbers of uninsured. The
question really was affordability. A
number of groups including the Jr. League of
A Substitute of the Bill was offered and passed without additional
amendments. An amendment was proposed by Sen. Schaffer relating to the
definition of 'insurer' but the amendment failed.
Sen. Seabaugh committed to working with folks on the definition prior to
the time that the Bill is heard on the Senate Floor. The Bill now goes to Rules
for consideration. House Appropriations' Subcommittee on Human Development
A number of advocacy groups testified this afternoon before Chair Gail
Buckner's Subcommittee about cuts or feared cuts in particular programs in the
Dept. of Human Resources' Budget proposals.
The comments ranged from air ambulances to treatment issues.
This Subcommittee will continue its hearings on Tuesday with information
on Block Grants and additional presentations from Departments impacted by this
section of the Budget. Senate Health and Human Services Sen. Don Cheeks' bill, SB 23, was heard in Committee this afternoon. This is Sen. Cheeks' version of abortion legislation. His bill proposes the creation of "A Woman's Right to Know Act," in Chapter 9 of Title 31. With some amendments, the Bill passed out of the Committee, even though a number of persons were present who testified about the issue. |
|