<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nelson Mullins Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>HIPAA Audit Lottery Begins This Month</title>
		<link>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=967</link>
		<comments>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=967#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pilson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation & Benefits Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Audit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Covered Entity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Office for Civil Rights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PHI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Protected Health Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HHS&#8217;s HIPAA enforcement arm, OCR (Office for Civil Rights), will begin HIPAA privacy and security audits this month, November 2011. Every &#8220;covered entity&#8221; is eligible, including covered entities that are health plans provided by employers. 150 covered entities will be chosen for what is described as a &#8220;pilot phase&#8221; that will conclude by December 2012.
For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HHS&#8217;s HIPAA enforcement arm, OCR (Office for Civil Rights), will begin HIPAA privacy and security audits this month, November 2011. Every &#8220;covered entity&#8221; is eligible, including covered entities that are health plans provided by employers. 150 covered entities will be chosen for what is described as a &#8220;pilot phase&#8221; that will conclude by December 2012.</p>
<p>For the full article, see <span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; font-size: 11pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><a href="http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/brief-11-14-2011">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/brief-11-14-2011</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=967</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Plan Limits Increase for 2012 – But Not All</title>
		<link>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=964</link>
		<comments>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=964#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pilson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation & Benefits Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2012 limits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[401(k) limits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[COLA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cost of living adjustment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pension plan limits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[qualified plan limits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IRS has released the 2012 cost-of-living adjustments for limits on pension and other retirement plans as well as for tax rates and other benefit limits. For the first time in several years, some of the key 401(k) and retirement plan limits will go up in 2012.
See the full article here - http://nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/brief-10-24-2011
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IRS has released the 2012 cost-of-living adjustments for limits on pension and other retirement plans as well as for tax rates and other benefit limits. For the first time in several years, some of the key 401(k) and retirement plan limits will go up in 2012.</p>
<p>See the full article here - <a href="http://nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/brief-10-24-2011">http://nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/brief-10-24-2011</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=964</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Reform&#8217;s 4-Page Summary of Benefits – Not Quite</title>
		<link>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=958</link>
		<comments>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=958#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pilson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation & Benefits Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[4-Page Summary of Benefits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Four Page Summary of Benefits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Group Health Plan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[open enrollment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Plan Administrator]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Plan Sponsor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SBC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Summary of Benefits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Summary Plan Description]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Affordable Care Act introduced a requirement for a 4-page summary of benefits and coverage to be distributed by group health plans and health insurers to let individuals compare health coverage options. On August 17, 2011, three federal agencies jointly issued proposed regulations under which the 4-page summary has grown to 6  (or up to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Affordable Care Act introduced a requirement for a 4-page summary of benefits and coverage to be distributed by group health plans and health insurers to let individuals compare health coverage options. On August 17, 2011, three federal agencies jointly issued proposed regulations under which the 4-page summary has grown to 6  (or up to 8 ) pages and is referred to as the SBC (summary of benefits and coverage), with a separate 4-page glossary and 34 pages of instructions for completing the summary. Comments on the regulations are due on or before October 21, 2011.</p>
<p>Read the Comp &amp; Benefits Brief by following this link: <a href="http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/comp-and-benefits-brief-health-care-reforms-4-page-summary-of-benefits-not-quite">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/comp-and-benefits-brief-health-care-reforms-4-page-summary-of-benefits-not-quite</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=958</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read Plan Terms Carefully - Implications on Stop-Loss Coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=955</link>
		<comments>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=955#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 20:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pilson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation & Benefits Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Clarcor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[COBRA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Madison]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plan document]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stop-loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the case of Clarcor, Inc. v. Madison Nat&#8217;l Life Ins. Co., the court held that stop-loss coverage was not available to cover the medical expenses of an employee that was not eligible under the terms of the plan.  In order to be eligible for benefits under the Clarcor plan, the plan document required [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case of Clarcor, Inc. v. Madison Nat&#8217;l Life Ins. Co., the court held that stop-loss coverage was not available to cover the medical expenses of an employee that was not eligible under the terms of the plan.  In order to be eligible for benefits under the Clarcor plan, the plan document required that employees (not on FMLA leave or on COBRA) must be regularly scheduled to work on at least 40 hours per week.  When Clarcor attempted to receive reimbursement for medical expenses incurred by an employee while the employee was on short term disability (and thus not scheduled to work 40 hours per week), the stop-loss carrier refused to pay.  Clarcor then sued the stop-loss carrier.</p>
<p>In ruling in favor of the stop-loss carrier, the court ruled that the plain terms of the document controlled and the employee was not eligible for benefits under the Clarcor plan.  Thus, the stop-loss carrier was not obligated to reimburse Clarcor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=955</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lifting the Veil: Fee Disclosures Are Coming - Final Deadlines Set</title>
		<link>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=952</link>
		<comments>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=952#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pilson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation & Benefits Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EBSA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fee Disclosures]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fiduciary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) issued an extension of the dates that both the service provider/fiduciary level and participant level fee disclosure rules will be applicable. The following are the key dates for calendar year plans to mark:
January 1, 2012: participant-level rules apply
April 1, 2012: fiduciary-level rules are effective
May 31, 2012: initial participant disclosures [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) issued an extension of the dates that both the service provider/fiduciary level and participant level fee disclosure rules will be applicable. The following are the key dates for calendar year plans to mark:</p>
<p>January 1, 2012: participant-level rules apply</p>
<p>April 1, 2012: fiduciary-level rules are effective</p>
<p>May 31, 2012: initial participant disclosures due</p>
<p>August 14, 2012: first quarterly participant disclosures due</p>
<p>Read the Comp &amp; Benefits Brief by following this link:</p>
<p><span style="font-family: &quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;; font-size: 11pt; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><a href="http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/comp-and-benefits-brief-lifting-the-veil-fee-disclosures-are-coming-final-deadlines-set"><span style="color: #800080;">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/comp-and-benefits-brief-lifting-the-veil-fee-disclosures-are-coming-final-deadlines-set</span></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=952</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Claims Procedure - External Review Process</title>
		<link>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=948</link>
		<comments>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=948#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pilson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation & Benefits Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Claims Procedure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[External Review Process]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Grandfathered Plan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[January 1]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Health Reform legislation added a requirement that group health plans, other than &#8220;grandfathered&#8221; group health plans, provide for an external review of claims after application of the internal claims review procedures.  The requirements vary, with one set for insured plans and one set for self-insured plans.  Effective dates have varied with most applying to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Health Reform legislation added a requirement that group health plans, other than &#8220;grandfathered&#8221; group health plans, provide for an external review of claims after application of the internal claims review procedures.  The requirements vary, with one set for insured plans and one set for self-insured plans.  Effective dates have varied with most applying to plan years on or after July 1, 2011 and with many applying to plan years on or after January 1, 2012.  It is important to start now understanding the new system for external review and where your group health plan fits.  Be ready to explain the new process in this fall&#8217;s open enrollment materials. Read the Comp &amp; Benefits Brief by following this link:<br />
<a href="http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/comp-and-benefits-brief-external-review-of-health-plan-claims-will-you-be-prepared">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/comp-and-benefits-brief-external-review-of-health-plan-claims-will-you-be-prepared</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=948</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Supreme Court&#8217;s New View of Plan Documents &#038; SPDs</title>
		<link>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=940</link>
		<comments>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=940#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pilson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation & Benefits Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amara]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cigna Corp.]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Disclosures]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fiduciary breach]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[monetary relief]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Plan terms]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SPD]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Summary Plan Descriptions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wear-away]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In May, the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s decision, CIGNA Corp v. Amara, refused to read terms in a summary plan description (&#8221;SPD&#8221;) as the correct plan terms, saying that the SPD disclosures are about the plan and not a part of the plan.  When the SPD differs from the plan, an ERISA lawsuit to recover plan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In May, the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s decision, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">CIGNA Corp v. Amara</span>, refused to read terms in a summary plan description (&#8221;SPD&#8221;) as the correct plan terms, saying that the SPD disclosures are about the plan and not a part of the plan.  When the SPD differs from the plan, an ERISA lawsuit to recover plan benefits cannot claim benefits based on the SPD terms rather than the terms of the plan document.</p>
<p>Read the Comp and Benefits Brief by following this link:</p>
<p class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><a href="http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/comp-and-benefits-brief_6-14-11">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/comp-and-benefits-brief_6-14-11</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=940</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>June 30th Deadline to Amend Cafeteria Plan to Exclude OTC Drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=936</link>
		<comments>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=936#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pilson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation & Benefits Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[125 Plan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amend]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amendment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cafeteria Plan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Flexible Spending Account]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health Reimbursement Account]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health Savings Account]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[June 30]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Over-the-Counter Drugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Prescription Drug]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may recall, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (&#8221;PPACA&#8221;) added a new Section 106(f) to the Internal Revenue Code (&#8221;Code&#8221;) which provides that, effective January 1, 2011, expenses incurred for medicines or drugs may be paid or reimbursed by an employer-provided plan, including a health flexible spending account (&#8221;FSA&#8221;), health reimbursement arrangement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you may recall, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (&#8221;PPACA&#8221;) added a new Section 106(f) to the Internal Revenue Code (&#8221;Code&#8221;) which provides that, effective January 1, 2011, expenses incurred for medicines or drugs may be paid or reimbursed by an employer-provided plan, including a health flexible spending account (&#8221;FSA&#8221;), health reimbursement arrangement (&#8221;HRA&#8221;), or a health savings account (&#8221;HSA) <em>only if </em>the medicine:<br />
a) is a prescription drug; or<br />
b) is available without a prescription (i.e., &#8220;over-the-counter&#8221; drug) but the individual, nevertheless, obtains a prescription; or<br />
c) is insulin.</p>
<p>In other words, expenses incurred for over-the-counter drugs without a prescription cannot be reimbursed under FSAs, HRAs, or HSAs. See Notice 2010-59.</p>
<p>Plan sponsors should amend their plans by June 30, 2011 to incorporate this change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=936</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repeal of PPACA&#8217;s &#8220;Free Choice&#8221; Voucher Requirement</title>
		<link>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=933</link>
		<comments>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=933#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pilson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation & Benefits Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Appropriations Bill]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Free Choice Voucher]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health Reform]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[repeal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While a complete repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (&#8221;PPACA&#8221;) appears to be unlikely, Republicans have chipped away at several provisions.  The final appropriations bill, signed by President Obama on April 15th, funds the government through September 30, 2011 and also contains a provision which repeals the &#8220;Free Choice Voucher&#8221; rule [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While a complete repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (&#8221;PPACA&#8221;) appears to be unlikely, Republicans have chipped away at several provisions.  The final appropriations bill, signed by President Obama on April 15th, funds the government through September 30, 2011 and also contains a provision which repeals the &#8220;Free Choice Voucher&#8221; rule in PPACA.</p>
<p>PPACA&#8217;s Free Choice Voucher rule would have required employers to provide vouchers (equal to the employer-paid portion of health costs) to certain employees who are exempt from PPACA&#8217;s individual mandate because of their income level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=933</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cost of Ignoring the IRS</title>
		<link>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=931</link>
		<comments>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=931#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Pilson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Compensation & Benefits Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[401(k) plan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Audit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[correction]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EPCRS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[questionnaire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VCP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?p=931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In May 2010, the IRS sent a detailed 401(k) plan questionnaire to 1,200 plan sponsors as part of their information gathering process.  As the IRS now evaluates the responses to the questionnaire and prepares an interim report by the end of September, it also warns the non-responding plan sponsors that they should expect a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In May 2010, the IRS sent a detailed 401(k) plan questionnaire to 1,200 plan sponsors as part of their information gathering process.  As the IRS now evaluates the responses to the questionnaire and prepares an interim report by the end of September, it also warns the non-responding plan sponsors that they should expect a full-scope examination of their plans.  </p>
<p>Non-responders should use the questionnaire as a preliminary self-audit to prepare for the expected IRS examination and should take corrective action before receiving the IRS notice, if possible.  Generally, penalties for corrections made while &#8220;under examination&#8221; (e.g. during an IRS audit) are significantly more expensive than corrections made before an audit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nelsonmullins.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=931</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

