The current decline in commercial real estate has been deeper and longer than any in recent memory. Real estate was one of the first segments of the U.S. economy to go into recession and likely will be one of the last to see sustained improvement. The pain felt in the real estate markets has been further compounded by the loss of jobs in the U.S. economy and the resulting decline in consumer spending. Today, even loans secured by high quality properties with strong ownership are at risk.
Nelson Mullins Weblog
Bank Notes
Charting a Course to Recovery (Common Strategies for Recovering on Real Estate Loans)
Wednesday, April 7th, 2010, posted by Nelson MullinsRuling Interprets Bankruptcy Code Provision to Allow Debtors to Evade Credit Bid Rights of Secured Creditors
Wednesday, March 24th, 2010, posted by Nelson MullinsOn March 22, 2010, a three judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a highly anticipated decision in the matter of In re Philadelphia Newspapers LLC, 2010 WL 1006647, (3rd Cir. Case No. 09-4266, 09-4349, March 22, 2010), affirming, in a 2-1 ruling, a decision of the United States District Court which held that the debtor would be permitted to conduct a sale of its assets through a proposed plan of reorganization without affording the secured lenders the opportunity to use any portion of their indebtedness as the basis of a credit bid at the time of the sale.
The decision affirms the District Court’s reversal of the Bankruptcy Court’s decision in which the Bankruptcy Court had refused to enter an order allowing the Debtor’s proposed bidding procedures because they did not afford the secured creditors the right to credit bid.
A Novel Approach to Failed Bank Acquisitions
Monday, March 8th, 2010, posted by Hailey CrockerThe Opportunity: Failed Bank Purchases
Many believe that the current pace of bank failures has created a once-in-a-generation buying opportunity. At year-end 2009, financial institutions with assets below a billion dollars and between one billion and ten billion were experiencing higher percentages of asset quality issues than larger banks. FDIC-facilitated acquisitions of failed whole banks provide an attractive opportunity for healthy banks to expand by acquiring failed bank deposits and assets whose risk is mitigated by the FDIC’s loss-sharing agreement.
The Problem for Community Banks
If there is so much opportunity to expand by acquiring failed banks from the FDIC, why have community banks not been more active acquirers?
Please follow the link to read the newsletter: http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/bank_notes_3-8-2010
Officers and Directors of Troubled Banks at Risk of Personal Liability
Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010, posted by Nelson MullinsIn 2009, there were 140 failed banks. So far this year, 16 more banks have been seized by the FDIC. There are 702 banks currently on the FDIC’s troubled banks list, and regulators and analysts predict that several hundred of those likely will fail over the next two years.
Officers and directors of troubled financial institutions should pay serious and immediate attention to their risk of personal liability should their bank fail because the risk of litigation is becoming increasingly high. However, there are actions that can be taken to minimize as much as possible the risk of personal liability to bank agencies and shareholders when a bank fails.
The New Bank Examination Environment
Tuesday, January 19th, 2010, posted by Nelson MullinsAnyone in the financial services industry who was paying attention in 2009 recognized that it was an unusually harsh bank regulatory and examination environment. Most bankers and industry observers expect more of the same in 2010. Areas that are sure to continue receiving the most intense review are asset quality, capital adequacy and liquidity.
New Overdraft Fee Limitations — Old Time Banking with New Era Consumer Protections
Friday, January 8th, 2010, posted by Preston McLaurinUnder Federal Reserve Regulation E amendments (the “Rules”), no bank will be able to assess a fee for paying an ATM or one-time debit card transaction when the consumer has insufficient funds in his or her account, unless, among other things, the consumer is first given a notice regarding the bank’s practices and the consumer then affirmatively consents. Follow the link for the full story:
http://www.nelsonmullins.com/newsletters/financial_advisory_1-8-10
Regulatory Enforcement Update
Tuesday, December 15th, 2009, posted by Nelson MullinsIn an April 2009 Bank Notes article, we noted the sudden increase in regulatory enforcement actions and associated civil money penalties against bank officers and directors. Because regulatory enforcement activities have continued to increase since then, this article again highlights the importance to officers and directors of considering all of the possible consequences to themselves personally before voluntarily consenting to proposed enforcement orders.
Thus far this year, the FDIC has issued 519 enforcement orders, including 293 C&Ds, compared to 314 enforcement orders, including 142 C&Ds, in 2008. Although Congressional criticism of bank agency oversight may in some measure explain the spike in formal enforcement actions, it is likely that some form of supervisory action may have been warranted in most of those enforcement cases. However, in the current regulatory environment, formal enforcement action seems to be the only option.
The Capital Markets are Back
Thursday, October 1st, 2009, posted by Preston McLaurinThe capital markets for banks appear to be back in business, and not just for banks looking to repay TARP funds. Any reasonably healthy bank with a sensible business plan should now be able to reenter the capital markets to supplement its capital to satisfy regulatory directives or to expand by buying weaker or failed banks.
Click the link to read the full newsletter:
http://www.nelsonmullins.com/news/newsletters/2009/10/01/the-capital-markets-are-back
Repurchasing Warrants from the Treasury Under the Capital Purchase Program
Monday, June 15th, 2009, posted by Nelson MullinsThe U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) has provided guidance in the form of FAQs and transaction documents for banks considering whether to repurchase the warrants they issued to the Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program (”CPP”) following the repurchase of the preferred stock issued by such banks to the Treasury. Several banks have now completed the repurchase of their warrants from the Treasury, and their experience may provide additional guidance for banks considering a warrant repurchase.
Click the link to read full newsletter:
How Good Is Your Deposit Account Agreement?
Friday, June 5th, 2009, posted by Nelson MullinsBy John ReVeal
If you are a community bank with under a billion dollars in assets, chances are good that you are still relying on the deposit agreements that you purchased when the bank was formed or when the bank was smaller. Those forms are designed to be uniform and to address the basic issues that every bank must address, and they can be a cost effective way for a smaller bank to meets its initial contractual needs. The problem is that those forms usually address only the basic issues and can leave a bank exposed to unnecessary risks and burdens.
Click the link to read full newsletter:
http://www.nelsonmullins.com/news/newsletters/2009/06/05/how-good-is-your-deposit-account-agreement
